And while the year-old scholar has been transferring his archives to the Canadian Centre for Architecture CCA , Frampton has not stopped teaching or writing: An updated edition of his book Modern Architecture: A Critical History —a classic—is in the works, with a new chapter that casts a brighter light on architecture practices outside the West. Zachary Edelson: Before you came to the U. How did that experience shape you? Kenneth Frampton: I was trained as an architect, I worked as an architect. That was my basic formation. I was also technical editor of the British magazine Architectural Design for two and a half years before coming to the States.
|Published (Last):||16 July 2012|
|PDF File Size:||16.17 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
After a short period of working as an architecture in London in the s, he started to teach and write at Columbia University. Instead of taking an active role in building, preferred to be in a theoretician side. Additionally, he studied about history of architecture. In his works he aimed that create a better understanding of cultural identity, contemporary demands, and the contextual features in architectural sense. Also, architecture should not be captured by technology and history.
It is not the implied territorial divide that interest Frampton. At issue is how architecture could or should define the periphery in contrast to the hegemonic architecture unfolding in the center. That fact gets more obvious in developing countries, as their aim to building a better environment requires a critical balance between getting remoteness and the qualification to participate in modern civilization. But in order to take part in modern civilization, it is necessary at the same time to take part in scientific and political rationality.
It is a fact every culture cannot sustain and absorb the shock of modern civilization. There is the paradox: how to become modern and to return to sources; how to revive an old, dormant civilization and take part in universal civilization. On the other hand, Frampton underlines that the critical regionalism is not the same thing when compared to vernacular architecture. A global modernization continues to reduce the relevance of agrarian-based culture, and our connection to past ways of life is broken, as the presence of universal world culture overpowers regionalist tendencies.
Therefore, regional culture must not be taken for granted as automatically imposed by place but, rather, cultivated and presented through the built environment. He prefers to use its concrete surface instead of its mass to highlight its specific spaces which include shadows and bouncing light off surfaces provided by these basic geometric forms. He compares six conceptual couples with a critical language. Culture and Civilization As mentioned before Frampton has comments about effects of civilization in terms of cultural diversity.
Additionally, there is a huge role of technological improvements and the financial waves that limit the scope of urban design in many ways.
The two last decades, however, have radically transformed the metropolitan centers of the developed world. The former has finally come into its own as the prime device for realizing the increased land value brought into being by the latter. The typical downtown which, up to twenty years ago, still presented a mixture of residential stock with tertiary and secondary industry has now become little more than a burolandschaft city-scape: the victory of universal civilization over locally inflected culture.
The Rise and Fall of the Avant-Garde Frampton states that the movements in the architecture in the midth century, with the starting of industrial process and Neoclassic form, was the reaction to the tradition part to the modernization as the Gothic Revival and the Arts-and-Crafts ideas take up a categorically negative attitude.
It is clear from the above that Critical Regionalism depends upon maintaining a high level of critic self-consciousness. It may find its governing inspiration in such things as the range and quality of the local light, or in tectonic derived from a peculiar structural mode, or in the topography of a given site. The Resistance of the Place-Form In architectural work, architects must study very well contextual features instead of acting it as a free standing object. It should be adapted the characteristic of place.
According to Frampton, the physical space of region and the place where the communication between people are not the same things. When applying critical regionalism to the design, architects should consider the idea that there is no limitation of physical space and the characteristic of place cannot be consisted of an independent building.
Spaces may be created by enclosing however its borders should be the beginning of the place instead of its ending. The spatial organization of a building should be solved in terms of its relation between exterior qualification of place such as; its entrance, exits, and the circulation.
While creating architectural structure on the natural environment, both these two elements should be merged with each other in order to achieve relationship between its concept, rather than a create a free standing object. The geographical characteristics and the cultural legacy will be decisive in the ecology, climate, and the symbolic aspect of place. That cooperation between the all senses makes architecture deeper and unique. This concept supports the usage of all materials which target all senses and that will allow variable emotional reactions.
In so doing, it endeavors to balance the priority accorded to the image and to counter the Western tendency to interpret the environment in exclusively perspectival terms.
Emphasis, Frampton says, should be on topography, climate, light; on tectonic form rather than on scenography i. Frampton draws on phenomenology for his argument. This is revealed by the rational, modular, neutral and economic, partly prefabricated concrete outer shell i. He notes, for instance, feeling the contrast between the friction of the brick surface of the stairs and the springy wooden floor of the council chamber. In addition to his own writings on the topic, Frampton has furthered the intellectual reach of these ideas through contributions, in the form of introductions, prefaces and forewords, written for publications on architects and architectural practices that conform with the ethics of critical regionalism.
But what could it mean to reactivate a text which, it seems, never really died in the first place? Architects are no exception and several practices currently position themselves in response to the age of transition that is ours. For him, it was within the specific conditions of a local context that an alternative approach could develop: an approach in which the tactile would surpass the visual, the tectonic would win over the scenographic, and the hybrid would be favoured over the homogeneous. It was by resisting both the reductive Functionalism of Late Modern architecture and the superficial aesthetics of the newly acclaimed Postmodern architecture, that these architects and others elaborated on an architectural approach inspired by the conditions in which their practice was rooted.
Kenneth Frampton Isn’t Done Changing Architecture
While working for Douglas Stephen and Partners he designed in the Corringham Building, an 8-story block of flats in Bayswater , London, the architecture of which is distinctively modernist; in it became protected as a listed building. He has been a member of the faculty at Columbia University since , and that same year he became a fellow of the Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies in New York -- whose members also included Peter Eisenman , Manfredo Tafuri and Rem Koolhaas -- and a co-founding editor of its magazine Oppositions. Frampton achieved great prominence and influence in architectural education with his essay "Towards a Critical Regionalism " — though the term had already been coined by Alexander Tzonis and Liane Lefaivre. In this paper, he mounts a criticism toward globalisation, mass consumer culture and the impact that this has had on architecture. For Frampton, this represents a particularly salient issue within the modern movement, as it has pushed architecture toward mediocrity, sameness and limited urban form which lacks any kind of cultural celebration or diversity.